[ROCm][CI] Expand trunk.yml coverage for ROCm#168162
Closed
jithunnair-amd wants to merge 5 commits intopytorch:mainfrom
Closed
[ROCm][CI] Expand trunk.yml coverage for ROCm#168162jithunnair-amd wants to merge 5 commits intopytorch:mainfrom
jithunnair-amd wants to merge 5 commits intopytorch:mainfrom
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/168162
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit d5d9850 with merge base fb6af11 ( FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Collaborator
Author
|
@pytorchbot rebase |
Collaborator
|
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
Collaborator
jeffdaily
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2025
pytorchmergebot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
…8202) Needed due to #168162, which means rocm-mi300.yml (uses noble images) and periodic-rocm-mi300.yml (uses jammy images) will both run on the new MI3xx capacity. Also re-enable `workflow_dispatch` with inputs required to run successfully Pull Request resolved: #168202 Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily
Collaborator
Author
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Collaborator
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
JacobSzwejbka
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
…8202) Needed due to #168162, which means rocm-mi300.yml (uses noble images) and periodic-rocm-mi300.yml (uses jammy images) will both run on the new MI3xx capacity. Also re-enable `workflow_dispatch` with inputs required to run successfully Pull Request resolved: #168202 Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily
JacobSzwejbka
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
We are expanding the test coverage on pre-submit (PR-based) trunk.yml runs for ROCm to the full list of unit tests. Consequently, we are swapping the labels (CSPs) for the rocm-mi300.yml and periodic-rocm-mi300.yml workflows to balance capacity concerns. We will be disabling the shadow workflow trunk-rocm-mi300.yml as it is not required due to this PR anymore. Fixes #166108 Pull Request resolved: #168162 Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We are expanding the test coverage on pre-submit (PR-based) trunk.yml runs for ROCm to the full list of unit tests.
Consequently, we are swapping the labels (CSPs) for the rocm-mi300.yml and periodic-rocm-mi300.yml workflows to balance capacity concerns.
We will be disabling the shadow workflow trunk-rocm-mi300.yml as it is not required due to this PR anymore.
Fixes #166108
cc @jeffdaily @sunway513 @pruthvistony @ROCmSupport @dllehr-amd @jataylo @hongxiayang @naromero77amd