Skip to content

[ROCm][CI] add mi355 to inductor perf test nightly#165326

Closed
amdfaa wants to merge 4 commits intopytorch:mainfrom
ROCm:add_mi355_nightly_bench
Closed

[ROCm][CI] add mi355 to inductor perf test nightly#165326
amdfaa wants to merge 4 commits intopytorch:mainfrom
ROCm:add_mi355_nightly_bench

Conversation

@amdfaa
Copy link
Contributor

@amdfaa amdfaa commented Oct 13, 2025

@amdfaa amdfaa requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2025 15:24
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 13, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/165326

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit b061ec3 with merge base 8360f34 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added module: rocm AMD GPU support for Pytorch topic: not user facing topic category labels Oct 13, 2025
@jeffdaily jeffdaily added the ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi300 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI300 label Oct 13, 2025
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot removed the ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi300 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI300 label Oct 14, 2025
@jeffdaily jeffdaily added ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi300 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI300 ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi355 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI355 labels Oct 14, 2025
@pytorch-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@pytorch-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot removed ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi300 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI300 ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi355 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI355 labels Oct 14, 2025
@jeffdaily jeffdaily added ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi300 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI300 ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi355 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI355 labels Oct 14, 2025
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Warning: Unknown label ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi355.
Currently recognized labels are

  • ciflow/b200
  • ciflow/b200-symm-mem
  • ciflow/binaries
  • ciflow/binaries_libtorch
  • ciflow/binaries_wheel
  • ciflow/h100
  • ciflow/h100-cutlass-backend
  • ciflow/h100-distributed
  • ciflow/h100-symm-mem
  • ciflow/inductor
  • ciflow/inductor-cu126
  • ciflow/inductor-micro-benchmark
  • ciflow/inductor-micro-benchmark-cpu-x86
  • ciflow/inductor-perf-compare
  • ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm
  • ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-x86-zen
  • ciflow/inductor-periodic
  • ciflow/inductor-rocm
  • ciflow/linux-aarch64
  • ciflow/mps
  • ciflow/nightly
  • ciflow/op-benchmark
  • ciflow/periodic
  • ciflow/periodic-rocm-mi300
  • ciflow/pull
  • ciflow/quantization-periodic
  • ciflow/riscv64
  • ciflow/rocm
  • ciflow/rocm-mi300
  • ciflow/rocm-mi355
  • ciflow/s390
  • ciflow/slow
  • ciflow/torchbench
  • ciflow/triton_binaries
  • ciflow/trunk
  • ciflow/unstable
  • ciflow/vllm
  • ciflow/win-arm64
  • ciflow/xpu

Please add the new label to .github/pytorch-probot.yml

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Warning: Unknown label ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi300.
Currently recognized labels are

  • ciflow/b200
  • ciflow/b200-symm-mem
  • ciflow/binaries
  • ciflow/binaries_libtorch
  • ciflow/binaries_wheel
  • ciflow/h100
  • ciflow/h100-cutlass-backend
  • ciflow/h100-distributed
  • ciflow/h100-symm-mem
  • ciflow/inductor
  • ciflow/inductor-cu126
  • ciflow/inductor-micro-benchmark
  • ciflow/inductor-micro-benchmark-cpu-x86
  • ciflow/inductor-perf-compare
  • ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm
  • ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-x86-zen
  • ciflow/inductor-periodic
  • ciflow/inductor-rocm
  • ciflow/linux-aarch64
  • ciflow/mps
  • ciflow/nightly
  • ciflow/op-benchmark
  • ciflow/periodic
  • ciflow/periodic-rocm-mi300
  • ciflow/pull
  • ciflow/quantization-periodic
  • ciflow/riscv64
  • ciflow/rocm
  • ciflow/rocm-mi300
  • ciflow/rocm-mi355
  • ciflow/s390
  • ciflow/slow
  • ciflow/torchbench
  • ciflow/triton_binaries
  • ciflow/trunk
  • ciflow/unstable
  • ciflow/vllm
  • ciflow/win-arm64
  • ciflow/xpu

Please add the new label to .github/pytorch-probot.yml

@jeffdaily
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge -f "tests were passing in prior runs; updated ciflow label and probot, don't wait for new runs (expensive)"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

zhudada0120 pushed a commit to zhudada0120/pytorch that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#165326
Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily

Co-authored-by: Jeff Daily <jeff.daily@amd.com>
Chao1Han pushed a commit to Chao1Han/pytorch that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#165326
Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily

Co-authored-by: Jeff Daily <jeff.daily@amd.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi300 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI300 ciflow/inductor-perf-test-nightly-rocm-mi355 Trigger inductor perf tests on ROCm MI355 Merged module: rocm AMD GPU support for Pytorch open source topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants