Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/164173
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New Failure, 12 Pending, 2 Unrelated FailuresAs of commit 923822b with merge base 5dbae1e ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
6cb38f6 to
fbf67f6
Compare
Removed pull request triggers and B200 runner configurations.
|
We need a rebase to avoid the clash with #164288 |
Summary: Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags:
65bff3e to
923822b
Compare
|
@pytorchbot merge -f 'Ops micro benchmark on ROCm has passed' https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/18182242863/job/51839016840?pr=164173 |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
This pull request adds support for running operator microbenchmarks on ROCm (AMD GPU) environments in the CI workflow. The main changes involve introducing new build and test jobs for ROCm in the `.github/workflows/operator_microbenchmark.yml` file. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#164173 Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn
This pull request adds support for running operator microbenchmarks on ROCm (AMD GPU) environments in the CI workflow. The main changes involve introducing new build and test jobs for ROCm in the
.github/workflows/operator_microbenchmark.ymlfile.cc @jeffdaily @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pruthvistony @ROCmSupport @dllehr-amd @jataylo @hongxiayang @naromero77amd