Skip to content

Conversation

@etaf
Copy link
Collaborator

@etaf etaf commented May 31, 2024

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

The XPU expected failure test case TritonCodeGenTests.test_codegen_config_option_dont_assume_alignment should have been expected passed after the PR #126261 merged, but due to test flaky, this case was skiped when landing the PR. The expected failure but passed error then exposed in periodic test: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/9302864965/job/25605549183#step:14:2082.

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @peterbell10 @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @desertfire @chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 31, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/127595

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

✅ No Failures

As of commit 85ab314 with merge base 0aaac68 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

etaf added a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
@etaf etaf changed the title [Inductor UT]Fix expected failure but pass for test case on Intel GPU. [Inductor UT] Fix expected failure but pass for test case on Intel GPU. May 31, 2024
@etaf etaf requested review from EikanWang and chuanqi129 May 31, 2024 03:26
@etaf etaf added the ciflow/xpu Run XPU CI tasks label May 31, 2024
@etaf etaf requested a review from jgong5 May 31, 2024 03:30
@EikanWang
Copy link
Collaborator

@etaf , have you updated the commit pin? otherwise, why can the case pass?

@etaf etaf removed the request for review from jgong5 May 31, 2024 05:33
@etaf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

etaf commented May 31, 2024

@etaf , have you updated the commit pin? otherwise, why can the case pass?

Updated the PR descirption, hope that answers your question.

@chuanqi129
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label May 31, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: Approvers from one of the following sets are needed:

  • superuser (pytorch/metamates)
  • Core Reviewers (mruberry, lezcano, Skylion007, ngimel, peterbell10)
  • Core Maintainers (soumith, gchanan, ezyang, dzhulgakov, malfet)
Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@etaf etaf requested a review from peterbell10 May 31, 2024 12:52
@atalman
Copy link
Contributor

atalman commented May 31, 2024

@pytorchmergebot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
Due to the xpu ci test has been enabled td by default, a lot of test cases (75%) have been skipped in CI tests. It caused some ci failures escaped from the ci tests, for example issue #127539. This PR depends on PR #127595 landed.
Pull Request resolved: #127611
Approved by: https://github.com/etaf, https://github.com/atalman
petrex pushed a commit to petrex/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
…U. (pytorch#127595)

The XPU expected failure test case `TritonCodeGenTests.test_codegen_config_option_dont_assume_alignment` should have been expected passed after the PR pytorch#126261 merged, but due to test flaky, this case was skiped when landing the PR. The expected failure but passed error then exposed in periodic test: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/9302864965/job/25605549183#step:14:2082.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#127595
Approved by: https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/chuanqi129, https://github.com/peterbell10, https://github.com/atalman
petrex pushed a commit to petrex/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
Due to the xpu ci test has been enabled td by default, a lot of test cases (75%) have been skipped in CI tests. It caused some ci failures escaped from the ci tests, for example issue pytorch#127539. This PR depends on PR pytorch#127595 landed.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#127611
Approved by: https://github.com/etaf, https://github.com/atalman
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/etaf/17/head branch July 1, 2024 02:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request ciflow/xpu Run XPU CI tasks Merged module: inductor open source topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants