Skip to content

Conversation

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 29, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/125196

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit b9573ac with merge base 4d717cd (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link
Contributor

@fegin fegin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix!

@anijain2305
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Apr 29, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

cc ezyang msaroufim bdhirsh chauhang voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
@anijain2305
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

The merge job was canceled or timed out. This most often happen if two merge requests were issued for the same PR, or if merge job was waiting for more than 6 hours for tests to finish. In later case, please do not hesitate to reissue the merge command
For more information see pytorch-bot wiki.

@anijain2305
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "stuck ci"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented May 2, 2024

@pytorchbot revert -m "breaking internal builds" -c ghfirst

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@anijain2305 your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
This reverts commit 8320b77.

Reverted #125196 on behalf of https://github.com/kit1980 due to breaking internal builds ([comment](#125196 (comment)))
pytorch-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
petrex pushed a commit to petrex/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
)"

This reverts commit 8320b77.

Reverted pytorch#125196 on behalf of https://github.com/kit1980 due to breaking internal builds ([comment](pytorch#125196 (comment)))
fathnd pushed a commit to fathnd/homomorphic that referenced this pull request May 5, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/anijain2305/304/head branch June 10, 2024 01:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants