Skip to content

Conversation

@ysiraichi
Copy link
Collaborator

@ysiraichi ysiraichi commented Sep 29, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

This PR inlines the expecteds strings onto the assertExpectedInline calls, so that, when
change is needed, we may do that by using the expectedtest machinery: setting the
environment variable EXPECTTEST_ACCEPT=1.

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @Xia-Weiwen @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @chenyang78 @aakhundov @kadeng

This PR inlines the expecteds strings onto the `assertExpectedInline` calls, so that, when
change is needed, we may do that by using the `expectedtest` machinery: setting the
environment variable `EXPECTTEST_ACCEPT=1`.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 29, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/110290

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit df8dbf1 with merge base 428cbd7 (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

This PR inlines the expecteds strings onto the `assertExpectedInline` calls, so that, when
change is needed, we may do that by using the `expectedtest` machinery: setting the
environment variable `EXPECTTEST_ACCEPT=1`.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
Fix: #109247

This PR flattens `wrap` outputs by inlining `pytree.tree_flatten` function after calling
the inner function.

Pull Request resolved: #109433
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #110290
@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented Oct 2, 2023

@pytorchbot revert -m "Broke multiple tests and also lint https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/6384854768/job/17329068768" -c ignoredsignal

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ysiraichi your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
This reverts commit 651b198.

Reverted #109433 on behalf of https://github.com/kit1980 due to Depends on reverted #110290 ([comment](#109433 (comment)))
@ysiraichi ysiraichi reopened this Oct 2, 2023
@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented Oct 2, 2023

@pytorchbot revert -m "Broke multiple tests and also lint https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/6384854768/job/17329068768" -c ignoredsignal

Actually this one may be OK and the next one in the stack is the problem, but because it was landed as a stack, the CI was run only on the last PR.

This PR inlines the expecteds strings onto the `assertExpectedInline` calls, so that, when
change is needed, we may do that by using the `expectedtest` machinery: setting the
environment variable `EXPECTTEST_ACCEPT=1`.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
@zou3519 zou3519 added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 3, 2023
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2023
Fix: #109247

This PR flattens `wrap` outputs by inlining `pytree.tree_flatten` function after calling
the inner function.

Pull Request resolved: #109433
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
ghstack dependencies: #110290
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/ysiraichi/95/head branch October 7, 2023 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants