Skip to content

Conversation

The basic idea is that if we're trying to match for an accuracy
error, we don't want to switch to a compile/runtime error, because
that's probably us breaking things in a different way.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 29, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/100324

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 2 Active SEVs

There are 2 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

✅ 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit 1befd97:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base 123be4b:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

…dels"

The basic idea is that if we're trying to match for an accuracy
error, we don't want to switch to a compile/runtime error, because
that's probably us breaking things in a different way.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

cc soumith voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2023
The basic idea is that if we're trying to match for an accuracy
error, we don't want to switch to a compile/runtime error, because
that's probably us breaking things in a different way.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: 7c414e5
Pull Request resolved: #100324
@albanD albanD removed their request for review May 1, 2023 18:42
@ezyang ezyang requested a review from anijain2305 May 2, 2023 01:00
@ezyang ezyang added the topic: not user facing topic category label May 2, 2023
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented May 2, 2023

@pytorchbot merge -f "ci is irrelevant"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: PR #100323 has not been reviewed yet

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

…dels"

The basic idea is that if we're trying to match for an accuracy
error, we don't want to switch to a compile/runtime error, because
that's probably us breaking things in a different way.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

cc soumith voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented May 2, 2023

@pytorchbot merge -f "spurious failures only"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

valentinandrei pushed a commit to valentinandrei/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 2, 2023
…ch#100324)

The basic idea is that if we're trying to match for an accuracy
error, we don't want to switch to a compile/runtime error, because
that's probably us breaking things in a different way.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#100324
Approved by: https://github.com/voznesenskym
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/ezyang/2053/head branch June 8, 2023 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants