Skip to content

Lint before testing in the CI#488

Merged
bdraco merged 1 commit into
python-zeroconf:masterfrom
bdraco:lint_before_test
Jun 7, 2021
Merged

Lint before testing in the CI#488
bdraco merged 1 commit into
python-zeroconf:masterfrom
bdraco:lint_before_test

Conversation

@bdraco

@bdraco bdraco commented Jun 7, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • If there is a lint problem, we fail before we start running the
    tests to ensure the submitter gets feedback right away instead
    of waiting for the tests to run.

- If there is a lint problem, we fail before we start running the
  tests to ensure the submitter gets feedback right away instead
  of waiting for the tests to run.
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jun 7, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #488 (3feb751) into master (49db96d) will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #488      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.01%   95.92%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines        3414     3414              
  Branches      412      412              
==========================================
- Hits         3278     3275       -3     
- Misses         80       83       +3     
  Partials       56       56              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
zeroconf/__init__.py 92.54% <0.00%> (-0.19%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 49db96d...3feb751. Read the comment docs.

@bdraco bdraco merged commit 69880ae into python-zeroconf:master Jun 7, 2021
@bdraco bdraco deleted the lint_before_test branch June 7, 2021 02:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants