Skip to content

Conversation

@JosXa
Copy link
Contributor

@JosXa JosXa commented Sep 11, 2017

I've added a TODO tag in the helpers file where cyclic imports would happen if I didn't put the import statements inside of the method. This should be fixed before merging.

…of message as a string from an update or message.
@JosXa JosXa requested a review from Eldinnie September 11, 2017 21:45
@Eldinnie
Copy link
Member

I rebased on master. Two things I would like to see on this.
Tests for all occurencies (no type, and an update passed instead of a message)
And please revert the param line in test_message

Copy link
Member

@Eldinnie Eldinnie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests for all occurencies (no type, and an update passed instead of a message)
And please revert the param line in test_message

@Eldinnie
Copy link
Member

@JosXa what is the status for this?

@JosXa
Copy link
Contributor Author

JosXa commented Sep 25, 2017

@Eldinnie I don't have much time atm. Hope to get to all my open issues end of the week

@Eldinnie
Copy link
Member

@JosXa 👍

@JosXa
Copy link
Contributor Author

JosXa commented Oct 2, 2017

Made changes as requested.

Question remains: Can/should we do something about the cyclic import (see helpers.py, "TODO")?

@JosXa JosXa self-assigned this Oct 7, 2017
@python-telegram-bot python-telegram-bot deleted a comment from codecov bot Feb 1, 2018
@JosXa
Copy link
Contributor Author

JosXa commented Feb 1, 2018

Integration tests fail because of flood timeouts etc. PR lgtm.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #826 into master will decrease coverage by 0.18%.
The diff coverage is 88.23%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #826      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.83%   91.64%   -0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         103      103              
  Lines        4052     4070      +18     
  Branches      639      645       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         3721     3730       +9     
- Misses        193      198       +5     
- Partials      138      142       +4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
telegram/message.py 96.26% <100%> (-0.73%) ⬇️
telegram/utils/helpers.py 82.6% <83.33%> (+0.25%) ⬆️
telegram/utils/request.py 67.85% <0%> (-0.9%) ⬇️
telegram/bot.py 87.57% <0%> (-0.44%) ⬇️

@tsnoam
Copy link
Member

tsnoam commented Feb 10, 2018

@Eldinnie @JosXa
lgtm
i added two small commits.
i think we can merge after CI

@Eldinnie
Copy link
Member

Coverage is not 100% because this case is never tested:
https://github.com/python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-bot/pull/826/files#diff-f070280279d9dc7a6c79eb51d4ab9156R140
Not a very big problem to me.
Good to merge

@tsnoam tsnoam merged commit 9338dc4 into master Feb 15, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

🔌 enhancement pr description: enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants