Skip to content

Conversation

@harshil21
Copy link
Member

Closes #3732

I don't think anything in tests need to change?

@harshil21 harshil21 added 🛠 refactor change type: refactor 🔗 python related technology: python labels Jun 3, 2023
@harshil21 harshil21 added this to the v20.4 milestone Jun 3, 2023
@harshil21 harshil21 linked an issue Jun 4, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@Bibo-Joshi Bibo-Joshi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the tests don't have explicit cases for py 3.7, right. Howover, I am wondering if it is possible to pickle data in 3.7 and unpickle it in 3.8 🤔 Could you check?

Copy link
Member

@Bibo-Joshi Bibo-Joshi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM 👍 Did you have any chance to test if py37-pickled files can be loaded in py38?

@Bibo-Joshi Bibo-Joshi merged commit 9d3345c into drop-py-37 Jun 9, 2023
@Bibo-Joshi Bibo-Joshi deleted the pp-workaround branch June 9, 2023 16:10
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 17, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

🔗 python related technology: python 🛠 refactor change type: refactor

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adopt Py3.8+ features: Drop workaround in PicklePersistence

3 participants