Remark support for JSONC #223
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Spitfire1900
force-pushed
the
jsonc-mention
branch
from
5c7544f to
ffdf28c
Compare
lelit
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 3, 2025
This is a reimplementation of the suggestion made by `PR #223`.
Contributor
|
I opted for a softer mentioning, thanks anyway! |
langmm
pushed a commit
to cropsinsilico/python-rapidjson
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2025
This is a reimplementation of the suggestion made by `PR python-rapidjson#223`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is one of the only JSON parser projects on PyPI that properly supports JSONC, it would be useful to market on that as well as provide an example of how to use the bitwise flags with the library.