Add note to FAQ regarding search referrals #409
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fredthomsen
force-pushed
the
additionalSearchRefInfoInFaq
branch
from
ad34b9c to
8814bda
Compare
droideck
previously approved these changes
Apr 12, 2021
Contributor
droideck
left a comment
droideck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Besides that, looks good to me!
fredthomsen
force-pushed
the
additionalSearchRefInfoInFaq
branch
from
8814bda to
651072f
Compare
Contributor
Author
@droideck updates made. |
Several posts across the web in regards to this issue, so an additional note in the answer to this question seems warranted. Basing this answer on message this message in the mailing list: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ldap/2014q1/003350.html
fredthomsen
force-pushed
the
additionalSearchRefInfoInFaq
branch
from
651072f to
d0b9580
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Several posts across the web in regards to this issue, so an additional
note in the answer to this question seems warranted.
Basing this answer on message this message in the mailing list:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ldap/2014q1/003350.html
Can client code safely assume that a DN of
Noneis always a search referral, because that is what I took from the message linked above?