Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.62%. Comparing base (73b6d16) to head (941ec92).
Report is 211 commits behind head on master.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1126   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.62%   92.62%           
=======================================
  Files          96       96           
  Lines        6117     6117           
  Branches     1510     1510           
=======================================
  Hits         5666     5666           
  Misses        353      353           
  Partials       98       98           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Could we make do with just only two labels: "stale" and "needs-more-information"? Although given that our inbox for PRs and issues is rather short, I'm not sure if it's worth to close issues & PRs automatically :-)

We do have 66 open issues, some going back 4 years, which is quite a lot 😂. Can definately drop waiting-for-reporter but I think we should keep no-stale so we can mark certain issues not to be closed.

Some of those are our own to-do list items, so I wouldn't worry much about them. We could convert the issues that still make sense into a project to track them more nicely, but I don't personally like auto-closing of (unresolved) issues as open ones appear directly when searching.

That being said, I'm not against performing some actions to make reporters/contributors aware through notifications what this would do, so I'd say it's your call :-)

Let's go with this as I think it's good to have a more manageable list and also give consumers an opportunity to keep things alive and show engagement. Anything we want to keep for ourselves we should mark as no-stale when we get the notification.