Coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 84.653% when pulling af08a30 on bnavigator:fix-latex into 4785145 on python-control:master.

I think normal scientific notation uses \times instead of \cdot. Is there a reason not to use \times?

Also, scientific notation in Python uses a leading 0 and so 100 becomes 1e02 which becomes 10^{02}, which looks a bit odd. Can you strip the leading 0?

Also, not a huge deal, but might be nice to have some unit tests to verify this works correctly.

Both seems to exist. See for example the documentation for the LaTeX siunitx package, page 28. I am used to \cdot, but maybe that's just more common here in Germany. How about having it configurable in the .config module and set \times as default?

Coveralls is a mystery to me.