Skip to content

Intended way to define a mutually exclusive group inside a normal argument group with with_annotated #1687

@neoniobium

Description

@neoniobium

Question, Bug report or Feature Request

Is there an intended way to define a mutually exclusive argument group inside a normal argument group when using the with_annotated decorator?

I think this is supported by builtin argparse, while nested argument groups and normal argument groups inside mutually exclusive argument groups are not supported at least since Python 3.11. See argparse

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions