Merged
Conversation
JulienPalard
requested changes
Jul 12, 2018
library/functools.po
Outdated
| "l'opération pour ce type ::" | ||
| "l'attribut :func:`register` de la fonction générique. C'est un décorateur. " | ||
| "Pour les fonctions annotées avec des types, le décorateur infère le type du " | ||
| "premier argument automatiquement::" |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Il manque un espace insécable avant le "::". Si tu ne sais pas taper d'espace insécable, tu peux écrire " : ::" (espace, deux points, espace, deux points deux points).
library/functools.po
Outdated
| "can be passed explicitly to the decorator itself::" | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| "Pour le code qui n’utilise pas les annotations de type, l’argument du type " | ||
| "souhaité peut être passé explicitement au décorateur::" |
library/functools.po
Outdated
| #: ../Doc/library/functools.rst:382 | ||
| msgid "The :func:`register` attribute supports using type annotations." | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| "L’attribut :func:`register` support l’utilisation des annotations de type." |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/support/gère/ ou peut être accepte.
Linkid
reviewed
Jul 13, 2018
Contributor
Linkid
left a comment
Linkid
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Super :).
J'ai juste laissé une petite note pour améliorer la compréhension.
library/functools.po
Outdated
| "For code which doesn't use type annotations, the appropriate type argument " | ||
| "can be passed explicitly to the decorator itself::" | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| "Pour le code qui n’utilise pas les annotations de type, l’argument du type " |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Je dirais plutôt : « […] le type southaité peut être passé explicitement en argument au décorateur […] ».
Contributor
christopheNan
left a comment
christopheNan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Je crois que nous avons commencé à traduire "type annotations" par "indications de types".
Linkid
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2018
JulienPalard
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 23, 2023
Closes #224 Reviewed-on: https://git.afpy.org/AFPy/python-docs-fr/pulls/225 Reviewed-by: Yannick Gingras <ygingras@noreply.localhost> Co-authored-by: eviau <info@eviau.net> Co-committed-by: eviau <info@eviau.net>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.