Skip to content

Traducción de reference/simple_stmts#1165

Merged
cmaureir merged 8 commits intopython:3.9from
mikanchu:simple_statements
Mar 19, 2021
Merged

Traducción de reference/simple_stmts#1165
cmaureir merged 8 commits intopython:3.9from
mikanchu:simple_statements

Conversation

@mikanchu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mikanchu mikanchu commented Dec 4, 2020

closes #465

Hay un par de lineas que son un poco ambiguas.

@mikanchu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mikanchu commented Dec 10, 2020

Travis is green but the status is not updated here

@cmaureir
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

cmaureir commented Dec 11, 2020

Travis is green but the status is not updated here

Pues yo veo el error:

$ pospell -p dict.txt -l es_AR -l es_ES **/*.po

<rst-doc>:1: (ERROR/3) RFC number must be a number greater than or equal to 1; "RFC 2045 section 6.8 <2045#section-6.8>" is invalid. while parsing: Los datos codificados tendrán líneas nuevas cada 76 caracteres según :rfc:`RFC 2045 section 6.8 <2045#section-6.8>`, que era la especificación estándar de facto base64 cuando se escribió la especificación XML-RPC.

reference/simple_stmts.po:112:repulsivamente

reference/simple_stmts.po:273:subindicada

reference/simple_stmts.po:502:estan

reference/simple_stmts.po:978:inicializarlo

reference/simple_stmts.po:1061:cláusua

reference/simple_stmts.po:1061:inicializándolo

reference/simple_stmts.po:1069:especificadlos

reference/simple_stmts.po:1348:promt

The command "pospell -p dict.txt -l es_AR -l es_ES **/*.po" exited with 255.

@mikanchu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mikanchu commented Dec 11, 2020

Sí, lo estoy viendo tambien. Ahora parece que el hecho que pasara el build fue un espejismo

@mikanchu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mikanchu commented Dec 23, 2020

gracias @cmaureir ! Justo ahora me iba a poner y veo que lo has corregido.

xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
xooseph
xooseph reviewed Dec 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@xooseph xooseph left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sólo sobran espacios que no sé si afecten en algo :0. Me quedé en la sección "Declaraciones de asignación aumentada" (línea 377).

eamanu
eamanu reviewed Jan 22, 2021
View reviewed changes
@mikanchu @xooseph
Update reference/simple_stmts.po
a00bfd8 
Co-authored-by: José Luis Salgado Banda <49181840+josephLSalgado@users.noreply.github.com>
@mikanchu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mikanchu commented Jan 22, 2021

@josephLSalgado la gran mayoría de los espacios que sobran vienen porque se encontraban a origen y decidí mantenerlos.

eamanu
eamanu reviewed Jan 29, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eamanu eamanu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

La mayoria de los espacios que están marcados como sugerencia
no afectan en nada al momento de armar la documentación (eso
tengo entendido). Hay un par de comentarios que te deje que so si
serían buenos aplicar.

Por otro lado, el armado de la documentación está fallando, deberías
actualizar tu branch con el 3.8, porque ese error ya está resuelto.

@cmaureir @xooseph @eamanu
Apply suggestions from code review
a8eb0e1 
Co-authored-by: José Luis Salgado Banda <49181840+josephLSalgado@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com>
@cmaureir cmaureir changed the base branch from 3.8 to 3.9 March 19, 2021 19:22
@cmaureir cmaureir merged commit 3e71059 into python:3.9 Mar 19, 2021
@cmaureir
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

cmaureir commented Mar 19, 2021

Muchas gracias @mikanchu 🎉

@mikanchu mikanchu deleted the simple_statements branch April 10, 2021 09:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@cmaureir cmaureir cmaureir approved these changes

+2 more reviewers

@eamanu eamanu eamanu left review comments

@xooseph xooseph xooseph left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Translate reference/simple_stmts.po

4 participants

@mikanchu @cmaureir @eamanu @xooseph