Fix outdated info in datamodel about dicts#9807
Merged
Merged
Conversation
4383
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2018
Contributor
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2018
(cherry picked from commit a48e0eb) Co-authored-by: wim glenn <wim.glenn@gmail.com>
|
GH-10569 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch. |
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2018
(cherry picked from commit a48e0eb) Co-authored-by: wim glenn <wim.glenn@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pretty self explanatory, the docs say that Python has never made guarantees about iteration order but that's not true anymore. It's still relevant for info sets, though.
Could a maintainer please add a "trivial" or "skip issue" label?