-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.7k
GH-95245: Store object values and dict pointers in single tagged pointer. #95278
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
markshannon
merged 6 commits into
python:main
from
faster-cpython:merge-dict-and-values-pointers
Aug 1, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ffde281
Store object values and dict pointers in single tagged pointer.
markshannon 48563b3
Merge branch 'main' into merge-dict-and-values-pointers
markshannon 9fdad79
Fixup merge by deduplicating visit/clear functions and moving declara…
markshannon da9b388
Remove some pointless inline functions and better inforce invariants.
markshannon 0d06096
Add news
markshannon 562c103
Implement kumaraditya303 suggestions.
markshannon File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions
2
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2022-07-26-12-59-03.gh-issue-95245.GHWczn.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
| Merge managed dict and values pointer into a single tagged pointer to save | ||
| one word in the pre-header. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious why this one is a
-1? Naively, I would have expected something like (|1), ie setting the lowest bit. Which would be equivalent to+1.I assume there's something that goes horribly wrong with that native approach that I am missing, though?
(As far as I can tell, subtracting one should also work. Not sure what C does with null pointers in this context, though.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
_PyDictOrValues_SetValuesmutates the pointer;_PyDictOrValues_GetValuesrestores the pointer. Think of it as+1, as you suggest, we'd have to undo that using-1iso.+1. AFAICS, either way is fine.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for explaining!
I am working on a prototype with a tagged pointer elsewhere in the code, I so I was looking for exiting examples to learn from.
Thanks for confirming that either way is fine.
I was just wrecking my brain about whether there's something more going on that I was missing. (And something that I would thus be bound to get horriby wrong in my code, where I want to store either a pointer directly, or an odd integer, in the same memory location.)