Skip to content

gh-89682: [doc] reword docstring of __contains__ to clarify that it returns a bool#29043

Merged
iritkatriel merged 6 commits into
python:mainfrom
ivanistheone:typo_fix__contains__docstr
Nov 26, 2022
Merged

gh-89682: [doc] reword docstring of __contains__ to clarify that it returns a bool#29043
iritkatriel merged 6 commits into
python:mainfrom
ivanistheone:typo_fix__contains__docstr

Conversation

@ivanistheone

@ivanistheone ivanistheone commented Oct 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I was looking to implement a "custom object" to represent intervals of numbers

e.g. if x in interval(2,4) will be True if (x >= 2) and (x < 4).

I looked up help(list.__contains__) and it says "Return key in self" which I interpreted as returning the actual key, not a boolean. A moment of confusion ensured and I tested [2,3].__contains__(2) to check that return value of __contains__ is indeed boolean.

The docstring change suggestion makes the return type of __contains__ clearer.

A type hint for old school people who ? methods in jupyter notebooks ;)

@the-knights-who-say-ni

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

CLA Missing

Our records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA:

@ivanistheone

For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day
before our records are updated.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@ivanistheone

ivanistheone commented Oct 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

git diff --color-words for this PR

Screen Shot 2021-10-18 at 6 56 44 PM

  • red = words removed
  • blue = words added

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Nov 18, 2021

@MaxwellDupre MaxwellDupre left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok.

Comment thread Objects/typeobject.c Outdated
@iritkatriel iritkatriel changed the title doc: issue45519 Minor clarification in doc string for __contains__ builtin method gh-89682: [doc]Minor clarification in doc string for __contains__ builtin method Nov 26, 2022
@iritkatriel iritkatriel changed the title gh-89682: [doc]Minor clarification in doc string for __contains__ builtin method gh-89682: [doc] reword docstring of __contains__ method to clarify that it returns a bool Nov 26, 2022
@iritkatriel iritkatriel removed the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Nov 26, 2022
@iritkatriel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We'll need a news file for this. It's minor, but it touches a builtin.

@iritkatriel iritkatriel changed the title gh-89682: [doc] reword docstring of __contains__ method to clarify that it returns a bool gh-89682: [doc] reword docstring of __contains__ to clarify that it returns a bool Nov 26, 2022
this suggested by iritkatriel

Co-authored-by: Irit Katriel <1055913+iritkatriel@users.noreply.github.com>
@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry.

Please add it using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry.

Please add it using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

Comment thread Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2022-11-26-21-43-05.gh-issue-89682.DhKoTM.rst Outdated
@iritkatriel iritkatriel self-assigned this Nov 26, 2022
@iritkatriel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks, I'll merge once CI completes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants