[3.8] bpo-43285 Make ftplib not trust the PASV response. (GH-24838)#24881
Merged
gpshead merged 1 commit intopython:3.8from Mar 15, 2021
Merged
[3.8] bpo-43285 Make ftplib not trust the PASV response. (GH-24838)#24881gpshead merged 1 commit intopython:3.8from
gpshead merged 1 commit intopython:3.8from
Conversation
) bpo-43285: Make ftplib not trust the PASV response. The IPv4 address value returned from the server in response to the PASV command should not be trusted. This prevents a malicious FTP server from using the response to probe IPv4 address and port combinations on the client network. Instead of using the returned address, we use the IP address we're already connected to. This is the strategy other ftp clients adopted, and matches the only strategy available for the modern IPv6 EPSV command where the server response must return a port number and nothing else. For the rare user who _wants_ this ugly behavior, set a `trust_server_pasv_ipv4_address` attribute on your `ftplib.FTP` instance to True.. (cherry picked from commit 0ab152c) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
Contributor
|
Thanks @gpshead for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.6, 3.7. |
Contributor
|
Sorry @gpshead, I had trouble checking out the |
|
GH-24882 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch. |
Contributor
|
Thanks @gpshead for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
) (pythonGH-24881) bpo-43285: Make ftplib not trust the PASV response. The IPv4 address value returned from the server in response to the PASV command should not be trusted. This prevents a malicious FTP server from using the response to probe IPv4 address and port combinations on the client network. Instead of using the returned address, we use the IP address we're already connected to. This is the strategy other ftp clients adopted, and matches the only strategy available for the modern IPv6 EPSV command where the server response must return a port number and nothing else. For the rare user who _wants_ this ugly behavior, set a `trust_server_pasv_ipv4_address` attribute on your `ftplib.FTP` instance to True.. (cherry picked from commit 0ab152c) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> (cherry picked from commit 664d1d1) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
|
GH-24883 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
) (pythonGH-24881) bpo-43285: Make ftplib not trust the PASV response. The IPv4 address value returned from the server in response to the PASV command should not be trusted. This prevents a malicious FTP server from using the response to probe IPv4 address and port combinations on the client network. Instead of using the returned address, we use the IP address we're already connected to. This is the strategy other ftp clients adopted, and matches the only strategy available for the modern IPv6 EPSV command where the server response must return a port number and nothing else. For the rare user who _wants_ this ugly behavior, set a `trust_server_pasv_ipv4_address` attribute on your `ftplib.FTP` instance to True.. (cherry picked from commit 0ab152c) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> (cherry picked from commit 664d1d1) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
ned-deily
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2021
…H-24881) (GH-24882) The IPv4 address value returned from the server in response to the PASV command should not be trusted. This prevents a malicious FTP server from using the response to probe IPv4 address and port combinations on the client network. Instead of using the returned address, we use the IP address we're already connected to. This is the strategy other ftp clients adopted, and matches the only strategy available for the modern IPv6 EPSV command where the server response must return a port number and nothing else. For the rare user who _wants_ this ugly behavior, set a `trust_server_pasv_ipv4_address` attribute on your `ftplib.FTP` instance to True.. (cherry picked from commit 0ab152c) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> (cherry picked from commit 664d1d1)
ned-deily
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2021
…H-24881) (GH-24883) The IPv4 address value returned from the server in response to the PASV command should not be trusted. This prevents a malicious FTP server from using the response to probe IPv4 address and port combinations on the client network. Instead of using the returned address, we use the IP address we're already connected to. This is the strategy other ftp clients adopted, and matches the only strategy available for the modern IPv6 EPSV command where the server response must return a port number and nothing else. For the rare user who _wants_ this ugly behavior, set a `trust_server_pasv_ipv4_address` attribute on your `ftplib.FTP` instance to True.. (cherry picked from commit 0ab152c) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> (cherry picked from commit 664d1d1)
gentoo-bot
pushed a commit
to gentoo/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2021
) (pythonGH-24881) (pythonGH-24882) The IPv4 address value returned from the server in response to the PASV command should not be trusted. This prevents a malicious FTP server from using the response to probe IPv4 address and port combinations on the client network. Instead of using the returned address, we use the IP address we're already connected to. This is the strategy other ftp clients adopted, and matches the only strategy available for the modern IPv6 EPSV command where the server response must return a port number and nothing else. For the rare user who _wants_ this ugly behavior, set a `trust_server_pasv_ipv4_address` attribute on your `ftplib.FTP` instance to True.. (cherry picked from commit 0ab152c) Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org> (cherry picked from commit 664d1d1) Rebased for Python 2.7 by Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bpo-43285: Make ftplib not trust the PASV response.
The IPv4 address value returned from the server in response to the PASV command
should not be trusted. This prevents a malicious FTP server from using the
response to probe IPv4 address and port combinations on the client network.
Instead of using the returned address, we use the IP address we're
already connected to. This is the strategy other ftp clients adopted,
and matches the only strategy available for the modern IPv6 EPSV command
where the server response must return a port number and nothing else.
For the rare user who wants this ugly behavior, set a
trust_server_pasv_ipv4_addressattribute on your
ftplib.FTPinstance to True..(cherry picked from commit 0ab152c)
Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith greg@krypto.org
https://bugs.python.org/issue43285