Skip to content

[3.8] bpo-40457: Support OpenSSL without TLS 1.0/1.1 (GH-19862)#20127

Merged
miss-islington merged 1 commit into
python:3.8from
miss-islington:backport-6e8cda9-3.8
May 16, 2020
Merged

[3.8] bpo-40457: Support OpenSSL without TLS 1.0/1.1 (GH-19862)#20127
miss-islington merged 1 commit into
python:3.8from
miss-islington:backport-6e8cda9-3.8

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented May 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenSSL can be build without support for TLS 1.0 and 1.1. The ssl module
now correctly adheres to OPENSSL_NO_TLS1 and OPENSSL_NO_TLS1_1 flags.

Also update multissltest to test with latest OpenSSL and LibreSSL
releases.

Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes christian@python.org

Automerge-Triggered-By: @tiran
(cherry picked from commit 6e8cda9)

Co-authored-by: Christian Heimes christian@python.org

https://bugs.python.org/issue40457

Automerge-Triggered-By: @tiran

OpenSSL can be build without support for TLS 1.0 and 1.1. The ssl module
now correctly adheres to OPENSSL_NO_TLS1 and OPENSSL_NO_TLS1_1 flags.

Also update multissltest to test with latest OpenSSL and LibreSSL
releases.

Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes <christian@python.org>

Automerge-Triggered-By: @tiran
(cherry picked from commit 6e8cda9)

Co-authored-by: Christian Heimes <christian@python.org>
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tiran: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
miss-islington merged commit a669443 into python:3.8 May 16, 2020
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-6e8cda9-3.8 branch May 16, 2020 08:33
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tiran: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tiran: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants