Skip to content

bpo-38875: test_capi: trashcan tests require cpu resource#17314

Merged
vstinner merged 1 commit into
python:masterfrom
vstinner:test_capi_cpu
Nov 21, 2019
Merged

bpo-38875: test_capi: trashcan tests require cpu resource#17314
vstinner merged 1 commit into
python:masterfrom
vstinner:test_capi_cpu

Conversation

@vstinner

@vstinner vstinner commented Nov 21, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

test_capi: trashcan tests now require the test "cpu" resource.

https://bugs.python.org/issue38875

test_capi: trashcan tests now require the test "cpu" resource.
@vstinner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

cc @jdemeyer

@vstinner
vstinner merged commit 0127bb1 into python:master Nov 21, 2019
@vstinner
vstinner deleted the test_capi_cpu branch November 21, 2019 11:54
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @vstinner for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2019
…7314)

test_capi: trashcan tests now require the test "cpu" resource.
(cherry picked from commit 0127bb1)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GH-17319 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2019
test_capi: trashcan tests now require the test "cpu" resource.
(cherry picked from commit 0127bb1)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
jacobneiltaylor pushed a commit to jacobneiltaylor/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2019
…7314)

test_capi: trashcan tests now require the test "cpu" resource.
shihai1991 pushed a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2020
…7314)

test_capi: trashcan tests now require the test "cpu" resource.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

tests Tests in the Lib/test dir

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants