[3.8] bpo-34596: Fallback to a default reason when @unittest.skip is uncalled (GH-9082)#15781
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ed (pythonGH-9082) * bpo-34596: Fallback to a default reason when @unittest.skip is uncalled * Change default reason to empty string * Fix rst formatting of NEWS entry (cherry picked from commit d5fd75c) Co-authored-by: Naitree Zhu <Naitreey@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
@Naitreey and @voidspace: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
|
@voidspace: Please replace |
Contributor
Author
|
@Naitreey and @voidspace: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bpo-34596: Fallback to a default reason when @unittest.skip is uncalled
Change default reason to empty string
Fix rst formatting of NEWS entry
(cherry picked from commit d5fd75c)
Co-authored-by: Naitree Zhu Naitreey@gmail.com
https://bugs.python.org/issue34596