[3.6] bpo-36520: Email header folded incorrectly (GH-13608)#13610
Closed
websurfer5 wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
[3.6] bpo-36520: Email header folded incorrectly (GH-13608)#13610websurfer5 wants to merge 2 commits into
websurfer5 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
line during an email header folding operation
Member
|
Thanks for this PR. I'm closing this because the 3.6 branch is only accepting security fixes only. It doesn't accept bug fixes/new features anymore. Additionally, we will do the backport PR only after the PR on master has been reviewed and merged. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Folding long email headers that contain multiple UTF-8 words in the first line results in corruption when UTF-8 words are found in subsequent lines. The fix is to reset the variable tracking the encoded word location in the line when a new line is started.
https://bugs.python.org/issue36520