Skip to content

[3.7] bpo-27639: Correct return type for UserList slicing operation#13203

Merged
markshannon merged 1 commit into
python:3.7from
mblahay:3.7
May 26, 2019
Merged

[3.7] bpo-27639: Correct return type for UserList slicing operation#13203
markshannon merged 1 commit into
python:3.7from
mblahay:3.7

Conversation

@mblahay

@mblahay mblahay commented May 8, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added logic to getitem magic method for UserList to ensure that the return
type matches that of self.

https://bugs.python.org/issue27639

Added logic to __getitem__ magic method for UserList to ensure that the return
type matches that of self.
@mblahay
mblahay requested a review from rhettinger as a code owner May 8, 2019 17:51
@mblahay mblahay changed the title BPO-27639: Correct return type for UserList slicing operation [3.7] BPO-27639: Correct return type for UserList slicing operation May 8, 2019
@mblahay mblahay changed the title [3.7] BPO-27639: Correct return type for UserList slicing operation [3.7] bpo-27639: Correct return type for UserList slicing operation May 8, 2019
@mblahay mblahay closed this May 8, 2019
@mblahay mblahay reopened this May 8, 2019
@mblahay mblahay closed this May 9, 2019
@mblahay mblahay reopened this May 9, 2019
@mblahay

mblahay commented May 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This needs to be merged.

@matrixise
matrixise requested a review from markshannon May 17, 2019 09:51
@matrixise

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@markshannon because you merged the #13169 maybe you could merge this one.

@mblahay

mblahay commented May 23, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@markshannon it has been another week. This is the same change as was made in 3.8. Please provide any feedback that you believe is necessary. I would like it if this didn't hang out there too much longer.

@markshannon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry about the delay. LGTM.

@markshannon
markshannon merged commit f3d9094 into python:3.7 May 26, 2019
@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@markshannon: Please replace # with GH- in the commit message next time. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants