Skip to content

bpo-36625: Remove obsolete comments from docstrings in fractions module#12822

Merged
mdickinson merged 3 commits into
python:masterfrom
jmolinski:fractions_doc_36625
Apr 15, 2019
Merged

bpo-36625: Remove obsolete comments from docstrings in fractions module#12822
mdickinson merged 3 commits into
python:masterfrom
jmolinski:fractions_doc_36625

Conversation

@jmolinski

@jmolinski jmolinski commented Apr 13, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updated 3 docstrings in fractions.Fraction containing comments referring to python 3.0.

New docstrings are consistent with other docstrings in the fractions module.

https://bugs.python.org/issue36625

@mdickinson mdickinson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Does this need a Misc/NEWS entry?

@scoder

scoder commented Apr 14, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM, too. I don't think this merits bothering users with a "What's new" entry.

@mdickinson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Agreed that it doesn't need a what's new entry, but it should still have a Misc/NEWS entry, on general principles. (Specfically, these general principles: https://devguide.python.org/committing/#what-s-new-and-news-entries.) @jmolinski Please could you use the blurb tool to add an entry?

@jmolinski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mdickinson of course, I added the Misc/NEWS entry.

@mdickinson mdickinson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mdickinson
mdickinson merged commit a9a2880 into python:master Apr 15, 2019
@mdickinson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

All done. @jmolinski Thank you very much for the contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants