Does PER 3.0 has an issue with "very complex" example in section 2.5? #131

Hey, everyone!

Just noticed the way how "very complex" example is being put in 2.5:

I would think it is a little bit illogical, because it violates of how we're formatting multiline arguments for functions, see 4.5:

Another example is the same 2.5 section:

function somethingWithReflection(
    \ReflectionObject
    |\ReflectionClass
    |\ReflectionMethod
    |\ReflectionParameter
    |\ReflectionProperty $reflect
): object|null {
        // ...
}

That's why I suspect it is just a typo, and correct example for "veryComplex" would be:

function veryComplex(
    array
    |(ArrayAccess&Traversable)
    |(Traversable&Countable) $input
): ArrayAccess&Traversable {
    // ...
}

WDYT about it?

Feel free to ask me to create PR if my assumptions are correct 🙌

Best regards