Highlight function calls same as function names #1104
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
This type of tweak is something users should do as a customization to their color scheme and not something that I think should be linked here. If a good number of people disagree than I am willing to merge this. As a color scheme modification, you’d simply add a preferred color to setting to Just replace the guifg color with whatever you’d like to use for that color. |
Contributor
Author
|
Ah ok thanks for the clarification. Should I keep this open for now to see if others agree or do you want me to close the pull request? |
|
I can agree on this. Most colorschemes that add |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I had the following issue: function calls on objects are not highlighted and are colored the same way as parens or "noise". I'd expect them to be the same color as function names (which is the handled like that in most editors/ides afaik).
I wasn't sure if this was a missing feature or a bug so I used this simple vim plugin config to reproduce my issue securely:
Before:
After:
I don't have a lot of knowledge of vimscript so if this should be addressed elswhere in the code could someone point me in that direction.