Skip to content

✨ Cleanups after bumping Rukpak#928

Merged
varshaprasad96 merged 1 commit intooperator-framework:mainfrom
varshaprasad96:cleanups
Jun 13, 2024
Merged

✨ Cleanups after bumping Rukpak#928
varshaprasad96 merged 1 commit intooperator-framework:mainfrom
varshaprasad96:cleanups

Conversation

@varshaprasad96
Copy link
Member

This PR makes the following changes:

  1. Removes the use of a separate handler, given rukpak has now externalized its implementation.
  2. Removes the unpacking status, which is no longer required with the use of direct registry client.

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2024 17:42
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 12, 2024

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3fa711f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/666a9573adc35f00087257fb
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-928--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.15%. Comparing base (543dc15) to head (3fa711f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #928      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.45%   79.15%   +1.70%     
==========================================
  Files          17       15       -2     
  Lines        1153     1084      -69     
==========================================
- Hits          893      858      -35     
+ Misses        181      157      -24     
+ Partials       79       69      -10     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 57.19% <100.00%> (+0.38%) ⬆️
unit 54.70% <33.33%> (+3.27%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

joelanford
joelanford previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jun 12, 2024
@varshaprasad96
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like #916 is causing merge conflicts when added to the queue. Will rebase this after #916 gets merged.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 12, 2024
This PR makes the following changes:
1. Removes the use of a separate handler, given rukpak has
   now externalized its implementation.
2. Removes the unpacking status, which is no longer required with
   the use of direct registry client.

Signed-off-by: Varsha Prasad Narsing <varshaprasad96@gmail.com>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 13, 2024
@bentito bentito changed the title ✨ Clean ups after bumping Rukapk ✨ Clean ups after bumping Rukpak Jun 13, 2024
@bentito bentito changed the title ✨ Clean ups after bumping Rukpak ✨ Cleanups after bumping Rukpak Jun 13, 2024
@bentito
Copy link
Contributor

bentito commented Jun 13, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 13, 2024
@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good to me and seems reasonable to have #929 as a follow up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants