Bug Report
io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.KubernetesClientException: Failure executing: PATCH at: https://172.23.0.1:443/apis/policy/v1/poddisruptionbudgets/os-osfarm-cluster-manager-pdb?fieldManager=opensearchreconciler&force=true. Message: Operation cannot be fulfilled on poddisruptionbudgets.policy "os-osfarm-cluster-manager-pdb": the object has been modified; please apply your changes to the latest version and try again. Received status: Status(apiVersion=v1, code=409, details=StatusDetails(causes=[], group=policy, kind=poddisruptionbudgets, name=os-osfarm-cluster-manager-pdb, retryAfterSeconds=null, uid=null, additionalProperties={}), kind=Status, message=Operation cannot be fulfilled on poddisruptionbudgets.policy "os-osfarm-cluster-manager-pdb": the object has been modified; please apply your changes to the latest version and try again, metadata=ListMeta(_continue=null, remainingItemCount=null, resourceVersion=null, selfLink=null, additionalProperties={}), reason=Conflict, status=Failure, additionalProperties={}).
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.KubernetesClientException.copyAsCause(KubernetesClientException.java:238)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.OperationSupport.waitForResult(OperationSupport.java:507)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.OperationSupport.handleResponse(OperationSupport.java:524)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.OperationSupport.handlePatch(OperationSupport.java:419)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.OperationSupport.handlePatch(OperationSupport.java:397)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.BaseOperation.handlePatch(BaseOperation.java:713)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.HasMetadataOperation.lambda$patch$2(HasMetadataOperation.java:232)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.HasMetadataOperation.patch(HasMetadataOperation.java:237)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.HasMetadataOperation.patch(HasMetadataOperation.java:252)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.BaseOperation.serverSideApply(BaseOperation.java:1132)
at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.internal.BaseOperation.serverSideApply(BaseOperation.java:92)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.kubernetes.KubernetesDependentResource.create(KubernetesDependentResource.java:140)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.kubernetes.CRUDKubernetesDependentResource.create(CRUDKubernetesDependentResource.java:16)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.AbstractDependentResource.handleCreate(AbstractDependentResource.java:114)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.kubernetes.KubernetesDependentResource.handleCreate(KubernetesDependentResource.java:111)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.kubernetes.KubernetesDependentResource.handleCreate(KubernetesDependentResource.java:32)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.AbstractDependentResource.reconcile(AbstractDependentResource.java:62)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.SingleDependentResourceReconciler.reconcile(SingleDependentResourceReconciler.java:19)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.AbstractDependentResource.reconcile(AbstractDependentResource.java:52)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.workflow.WorkflowReconcileExecutor$NodeReconcileExecutor.doRun(WorkflowReconcileExecutor.java:115)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.workflow.NodeExecutor.run(NodeExecutor.java:22)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:572)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:317)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1144)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:642)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.AbstractDependentResource.handleCreate(AbstractDependentResource.java:114)
What did you do?
Creating PDB with DependentResource
However, even though resources are already created
k get PodDisruptionBudget ✔ 10357 17:43:26
NAME MIN AVAILABLE MAX UNAVAILABLE ALLOWED DISRUPTIONS AGE
os-osfarm-cluster-manager-pdb N/A 1 1 88m
When running additional 'reconcile' loop
The request was created as Create rather than Update
If there is a secondary resource, shouldn't the request go to update right?
Why is it created as create?
409 errors continue to occur, which is a problem
What did you expect to see?
What did you see instead? Under which circumstances?
no
Environment
Kubernetes cluster type:
Kubernetes
$ Mention java-operator-sdk version from pom.xml file
v4.4.4
$ java -version
jdk21
$ kubectl version
v1.23.15
Possible Solution
no
Additional context
no
Bug Report
at io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.AbstractDependentResource.handleCreate(AbstractDependentResource.java:114)What did you do?
Creating PDB with DependentResource
However, even though resources are already created
When running additional 'reconcile' loop
The request was created as
Createrather thanUpdateIf there is a secondary resource, shouldn't the request go to
updateright?Why is it created as
create?409 errors continue to occur, which is a problem
What did you expect to see?
What did you see instead? Under which circumstances?
no
Environment
Kubernetes cluster type:
Kubernetes$ Mention java-operator-sdk version from pom.xml filev4.4.4$ java -versionjdk21$ kubectl versionv1.23.15Possible Solution
no
Additional context
no