bump k8s dependencies to 1.26.2#211
Conversation
|
/hold |
everettraven
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall LGTM to enable k8s 1.26 support.
A general nit: I think we should investigate the deprecation notices from the lint check to see if there is an alternative we can change and do a little bit of future proofing for our next k8s bumps.
varshaprasad96
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rashmigottipati This doesn't seem to bump the scaffolding of the plugin. Would that be done as a follow up?
@rashmigottipati - deprecation errors, those functions completely removed or renamed in newer versions of k8s. We need to check and fix it before merging. |
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4352492700
💛 - Coveralls |
laxmikantbpandhare
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm
Looks good to me
|
@varshaprasad96 @everettraven could you please review this PR again? |
|
Thanks to @varshaprasad96 for helping fix the lint errors!!! |
rashmigottipati
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/hold
until operator-framework/operator-lib#112 merges first
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
everettraven
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From what I can tell all the changes look good. Thanks @rashmigottipati !
/lgtm
No description provided.