Skip to content

bump k8s dependencies to 1.26.2#211

Merged
rashmigottipati merged 8 commits intooperator-framework:mainfrom
rashmigottipati:k8sbump
Mar 7, 2023
Merged

bump k8s dependencies to 1.26.2#211
rashmigottipati merged 8 commits intooperator-framework:mainfrom
rashmigottipati:k8sbump

Conversation

@rashmigottipati
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rashmigottipati
Copy link
Member Author

/hold
while trying to figure out failing tests

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 1, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM to enable k8s 1.26 support.

A general nit: I think we should investigate the deprecation notices from the lint check to see if there is an alternative we can change and do a little bit of future proofing for our next k8s bumps.

Copy link
Member

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rashmigottipati This doesn't seem to bump the scaffolding of the plugin. Would that be done as a follow up?

@laxmikantbpandhare
Copy link
Member

Overall LGTM to enable k8s 1.26 support.

A general nit: I think we should investigate the deprecation notices from the lint check to see if there is an alternative we can change and do a little bit of future proofing for our next k8s bumps.

@rashmigottipati - deprecation errors, those functions completely removed or renamed in newer versions of k8s. We need to check and fix it before merging.

@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Mar 5, 2023
@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 6, 2023
rashmigottipati and others added 6 commits March 6, 2023 12:05
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 6, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4352492700

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 89.498%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3877933874: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1713
Relevant Lines: 1914

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@laxmikantbpandhare laxmikantbpandhare left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Looks good to me

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 6, 2023
@rashmigottipati
Copy link
Member Author

@varshaprasad96 @everettraven could you please review this PR again?

@rashmigottipati
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks to @varshaprasad96 for helping fix the lint errors!!!

Copy link
Member Author

@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold
until operator-framework/operator-lib#112 merges first

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 6, 2023
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2023
@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati changed the title bump k8s dependencies to 1.26.1 bump k8s dependencies to 1.26.2 Mar 7, 2023
@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 7, 2023
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From what I can tell all the changes look good. Thanks @rashmigottipati !

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2023
Copy link
Member

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati merged commit 6e30bde into operator-framework:main Mar 7, 2023
@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati deleted the k8sbump branch March 7, 2023 16:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps area/sdk area/testing lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants