Skip to content

Conversation

@FauziAkram
Copy link
Contributor

@FauziAkram FauziAkram commented Feb 3, 2025

VVLTC parameters tweak

Some notes:

  • Both tests were conducted on top of reduce full depth search twice #5848.
  • Based on tuning suggestions, the extension for capturing the previously moved piece was removed/simplified. (Developers can attempt to reintroduce it post-merge if needed.)
  • Initially, bonusScale = std::max(bonusScale, -2); was included but later removed in the second test upon Viz's request, however, it was nearly non-functional anyway.

Passed VVLTC under STC bounds:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 31508 W: 8153 L: 7895 D: 15460
Ptnml(0-2): 1, 2747, 10005, 2995, 6
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/679fdc7a0774dfd78deb1350

Passed VVLTC under LTC bounds:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 55026 W: 14370 L: 14046 D: 26610
Ptnml(0-2): 7, 4957, 17262, 5279, 8
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/679fec920774dfd78deb19b8

bench: 2589810

bench: 2589810
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

clang-format 18 needs to be run on this PR.
If you do not have clang-format installed, the maintainer will run it when merging.
For the exact version please see https://packages.ubuntu.com/noble/clang-format-18.

(execution 13123928043 / attempt 1)

@xu-shawn
Copy link
Contributor

xu-shawn commented May 5, 2025

Tuning run for future reference: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/679fa4610774dfd78deb1183

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants