Why are we including the TT aging tweak? It didn't even finish yellow. https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65ee7ef10ec64f0526c440dd

@mstembera
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65e1d50adcc71f091a8dafb1
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65e550d8416ecd92c162af7b

@FauziAkram Ah thanks! I looked at the wrong test and didn't see the earlier ones.

Simplification of TT tweak could be tested as it removes *2. Even if search+movepick tuning was done with included TT tweak, good practice after passing gaining tests would be to next try simplifying added logic (in this case multiplication with new parameter *2). This way we know for sure if added logic (however simple it may be) is elo gaining.

@Lowform From my point of view, its better to leave it as it is for some time, and maybe we can try to simplify it after some time has passed.

@FauziAkram I have also said this on discord, but I am not at all sure why you included this in your patch. You asked me if it is fine if you include it in a tune, so I assumed you meant a spsa tune which tunes this. Not randomly adding it on top of another patch, these things should be avoided. One should always thrive to first test something isolated and then make it more complex. If you have a large tune with many tuned variables it doesn’t make much sense to test them individually because it takes a) too long b) they might not synergize well… but this is just randomly adding patches together ?

I didn't randomly add patches together.
All tune patches, change more than a single parameter, this patch is the same.
Only parameter changes.