Less reduction for tt move. #4538
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This idea is a result of my second condition combination tuning for reductions: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/643ed5573806eca398f06d61 There were used two parameters per combination: one for the 'sign' of the first and the second condition in a combination. Values >= 50 indicate using a condition directly and values <= -50 means use the negation of a condition. Each condition pair (X,Y) had two occurances dependent of the order of the two conditions: - if X < Y the parameters used for more reduction - if X > Y the parameters used for less reduction - if X = Y then only one condition is present and A[X][X][0]/A[X][X][1] stands for using more/less reduction for only this condition. The parameter pair A[7][2][0] (value = -94.70) and A[7][2][1] (value = 93.60) was one of the strongest signals with values near 100/-100. Here condition nr. 7 was '(ss+1)->cutoffCnt > 3' and condition nr. 2 'move == ttMove'. For condition nr. 7 the negation is used because A[7][2][0] is negative. This translates finally to less reduction (because 7 > 2) for tt moves if child cutoffs <= 3. STC: LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00> Total: 65728 W: 17704 L: 17358 D: 30666 Ptnml(0-2): 184, 7092, 18008, 7354, 226 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/643ff767ef2529086a7ed042 LTC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50> Total: 139200 W: 37776 L: 37282 D: 64142 Ptnml(0-2): 58, 13241, 42509, 13733, 59 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6440bfa9ef2529086a7edbc7 Bench: 3865654
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This idea is a result of my second condition combination tuning for reductions: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/643ed5573806eca398f06d61
There were used two parameters per combination: one for the 'sign' of the first and the second condition in a combination. Values >= 50 indicate using a condition directly and values <= -50 means use the negation of a condition.
Each condition pair (X,Y) had two occurances dependent of the order of the two conditions:
The parameter pair A[7][2][0] (value = -94.70) and A[7][2][1] (value = 93.60) was one of the strongest signals with values near 100/-100. Here condition nr. 7 was '(ss+1)->cutoffCnt > 3' and condition nr. 2 'move == ttMove'. For condition nr. 7 the negation is used because A[7][2][0] is negative.
This translates finally to less reduction (because 7 > 2) for tt moves if child cutoffs <= 3.
STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 65728 W: 17704 L: 17358 D: 30666
Ptnml(0-2): 184, 7092, 18008, 7354, 226
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/643ff767ef2529086a7ed042
LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 139200 W: 37776 L: 37282 D: 64142
Ptnml(0-2): 58, 13241, 42509, 13733, 59
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6440bfa9ef2529086a7edbc7
Bench: 3865654