Skip to content

Conversation

@locutus2
Copy link
Member

@locutus2 locutus2 commented Jul 30, 2020

Less reduction for second move at non-check CUT node with depth <= 10

STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 38680 W: 7490 L: 7245 D: 23945
Ptnml(0-2): 643, 4441, 8967, 4606, 683
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f21e1782f7e63962b99f451

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 71976 W: 9003 L: 8636 D: 54337
Ptnml(0-2): 440, 6414, 21972, 6663, 499
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2245762f7e63962b99f4bd

Bench: 4623578

STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 38680 W: 7490 L: 7245 D: 23945
Ptnml(0-2): 643, 4441, 8967, 4606, 683
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f21e1782f7e63962b99f451

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 71976 W: 9003 L: 8636 D: 54337
Ptnml(0-2): 440, 6414, 21972, 6663, 499
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2245762f7e63962b99f4bd

Bench: 4623578
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 30, 2020

perhaps we should specify them as non-inCheck cut nodes so as to differentiate them from nodes that givesCheck?

@snicolet snicolet changed the title Less reduction for second move at non-check CUT node with depth <= 10. Tweak cutnode reduction Jul 31, 2020
@snicolet snicolet added the to be merged Will be merged shortly label Jul 31, 2020
@snicolet snicolet closed this in 9587eee Jul 31, 2020
@snicolet
Copy link
Member

Merged via 9587eee, congrats :-)

noobpwnftw pushed a commit to noobpwnftw/Stockfish that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2020
Less reduction for second move at non-check CUT node with depth <= 10.

STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 38680 W: 7490 L: 7245 D: 23945
Ptnml(0-2): 643, 4441, 8967, 4606, 683
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f21e1782f7e63962b99f451

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 71976 W: 9003 L: 8636 D: 54337
Ptnml(0-2): 440, 6414, 21972, 6663, 499
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2245762f7e63962b99f4bd

closes official-stockfish#2868

Bench: 4746616
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

to be merged Will be merged shortly

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants