Adjust singular extension search depth. #2590
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
Note - I changed halfDepth to singularDepth because it's not halfDepth any longer :) |
Member
|
Thanks, keep them coming! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
passed STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e72bbaae42a5c3b3ca2e75e
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 12692 W: 2608 L: 2389 D: 7695
Ptnml(0-2): 238, 1414, 2839, 1601, 254
passed LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e731c07e42a5c3b3ca2e770
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 145716 W: 19218 L: 18626 D: 107872
Ptnml(0-2): 1100, 13605, 42899, 14111, 1143
This patch continues work on applying different singular extension search logic in case position is ttPv && !PvNode. Now it changes depth of this search, lower for every other node and higher for this types of nodes.
It's 3rd patch passed on this idea, it seems that for some unknown reason optimal singular extension search is heavily connected with node being part of PV or not.
bench 5398277