Skip to content

Conversation

@svivanov72
Copy link

These operators are never used and do not make sense for these types.

No functional change.

These operators are never used and do not make sense for these types.

No functional change.
@protonspring
Copy link

I guess this makes sense. When I remove this line, my gcc5.4 makes exactly the same executable.

shrugs shoulders

@svivanov72
Copy link
Author

Yes this line has no effect. It adds a bunch of inline definitions that are never used (and should not be used IMO). It was somewhat confusing to me because other "full operators" are scale-invariant and the increment stands out. (E.g. it is natural to multiply Depth by 2, but the increment is ONE_PLY rather than 1). This is mainly cosmetic of course.

I guess this makes sense. When I remove this line, my gcc5.4 makes exactly the same executable.

shrugs shoulders

@snicolet snicolet merged commit 8b4521d into official-stockfish:master Jun 27, 2019
@snicolet
Copy link
Member

Merged via 8b4521d, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants