bench: 8732553

All actively maintained GUI are able
to understand UCI protocol, so there
is no more need for this obsolete file.

No functional change.

There is really little that user can achieve (apart
from a weakened engine) tweaking these parameters
that are already tuned and have no immediate or visible
effect.

So better do not expose them to the user and avoid the
typical "What is the best setup for my machine?" kind of
question (by far the most common, by far the most useless).

No functional change.

Book handling belongs to GUI, we kept this code
for historical reasons, but nowdays there is
really no need of this old, (mostly) unused
and especially incorrect designed functionality.

It is up to the GUI to choose the book (far easier for
the user) and to select the book parameters. In no
place, including fishtest, TCEC, rating lists, etc.
the "own book" is used, moreover currently SF is
released without any book and even if in the future we
bundle a book in the release package, it will be the GUI
that will take care of it.

This corrects a wrong design decision that Galurung
and later Stockfish inherited from what was common
practice many yeas ago.

No functional change.

Passed both STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50]
Total: 10094 W: 1833 L: 1704 D: 6557

and LTC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,6.00]
Total: 27738 W: 4147 L: 3928 D: 19663

bench : 8599236

No functional change.

Before it was working by accident in case of
see_sign() and failing with see() due to how
castle moves are coded (king captures the rook).

Better to explicitly filter out castling moves
and use see() without any surprise/trick.

No functional case.

Another attempt at retiring current asymmetric
king evaluation and use a much simpler symmetric
one. As a good side effect we can avoid recalculating
eval after a null move.

Tested in no-regression mode and passed

STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 21580 W: 3752 L: 3632 D: 14196

LTC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 18253 W: 2593 L: 2469 D: 13191

And a LTC regression test against SF DD to
verify we don't have regression against
weaker engines due to some kind of 'contempt'
effect:

ELO: 54.69 +-2.1 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 40000 W: 11072 L: 4827 D: 24101

bench: 8205159