Commit ca7d4e9
Eliminate ONE_PLY
Simplification that eliminates ONE_PLY, based on a suggestion in the forum that
support for fractional plies has never been used, and @mcostalba's openness to
the idea of eliminating it. We lose a little bit of type safety by making Depth
an integer, but in return we simplify the code in search.cpp quite significantly.
No functional change
------------------------------------------
The argument favoring eliminating ONE_PLY:
* The term “ONE_PLY” comes up in a lot of forum posts (474 to date)
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/fishcooking/ONE_PLY%7Csort:relevance
* There is occasionally a commit that breaks invariance of the code
with respect to ONE_PLY
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/fishcooking/ONE_PLY%7Csort:date/fishcooking/ZIPdYj6k0fk/KdNGcPWeBgAJ
* To prevent such commits, there is a Travis CI hack that doubles ONE_PLY
and rechecks bench
* Sustaining ONE_PLY has, alas, not resulted in any improvements to the
engine, despite many individuals testing many experiments over 5 years.
The strongest argument in favor of preserving ONE_PLY comes from @locutus:
“If we use par example ONE_PLY=256 the parameter space is increases by the
factor 256. So it seems very unlikely that the optimal setting is in the
subspace of ONE_PLY=1.”
There is a strong theoretical impediment to fractional depth systems: the
transposition table uses depth to determine when a stored result is good
enough to supply an answer for a current search. If you have fractional
depths, then different pathways to the position can be at fractionally
different depths.
In the end, there are three separate times when a proposal to remove ONE_PLY
was defeated by the suggestion to “give it a few more months.” So… it seems
like time to remove this distraction from the community.
See the pull request here:
#22891 parent 328bdd0 commit ca7d4e9
File tree
7 files changed
+86
-100
lines changed- src
7 files changed
+86
-100
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
56 | 56 | | |
57 | 57 | | |
58 | 58 | | |
59 | | - | |
60 | | - | |
61 | | - | |
62 | 59 | | |
63 | 60 | | |
64 | 61 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
61 | 61 | | |
62 | 62 | | |
63 | 63 | | |
64 | | - | |
| 64 | + | |
65 | 65 | | |
66 | 66 | | |
67 | 67 | | |
| |||
73 | 73 | | |
74 | 74 | | |
75 | 75 | | |
76 | | - | |
| 76 | + | |
77 | 77 | | |
78 | 78 | | |
79 | 79 | | |
| |||
206 | 206 | | |
207 | 207 | | |
208 | 208 | | |
209 | | - | |
| 209 | + | |
210 | 210 | | |
211 | 211 | | |
212 | 212 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments