Skip to content

Commit 9ad0ea7

Browse files
committed
Tune a few parameters related to evaluation
based on a SPSA tune (using Autoselect) https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61d5aa63a314fed318a57046 passed STC: LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50> Total: 61960 W: 16640 L: 16316 D: 29004 Ptnml(0-2): 278, 6934, 16204, 7314, 250 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61d7fe4af5fd40f357469a8d passed LTC: LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00> Total: 79408 W: 21994 L: 21618 D: 35796 Ptnml(0-2): 106, 7887, 23331, 8285, 95 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61d836b7f5fd40f35746a3d5 closes #3883 Bench: 4266621
1 parent 2efda17 commit 9ad0ea7

File tree

1 file changed

+7
-7
lines changed

1 file changed

+7
-7
lines changed

src/evaluate.cpp

Lines changed: 7 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ using namespace Trace;
192192
namespace {
193193

194194
// Threshold for lazy and space evaluation
195-
constexpr Value LazyThreshold1 = Value(3130);
196-
constexpr Value LazyThreshold2 = Value(2204);
195+
constexpr Value LazyThreshold1 = Value(3631);
196+
constexpr Value LazyThreshold2 = Value(2084);
197197
constexpr Value SpaceThreshold = Value(11551);
198198

199199
// KingAttackWeights[PieceType] contains king attack weights by piece type
@@ -1087,10 +1087,10 @@ Value Eval::evaluate(const Position& pos) {
10871087
// Deciding between classical and NNUE eval (~10 Elo): for high PSQ imbalance we use classical,
10881088
// but we switch to NNUE during long shuffling or with high material on the board.
10891089
if ( !useNNUE
1090-
|| abs(eg_value(pos.psq_score())) * 5 > (850 + pos.non_pawn_material() / 64) * (5 + pos.rule50_count()))
1090+
|| abs(eg_value(pos.psq_score())) * 5 > (849 + pos.non_pawn_material() / 64) * (5 + pos.rule50_count()))
10911091
{
10921092
v = Evaluation<NO_TRACE>(pos).value(); // classical
1093-
useClassical = abs(v) >= 300;
1093+
useClassical = abs(v) >= 298;
10941094
}
10951095

10961096
// If result of a classical evaluation is much lower than threshold fall back to NNUE
@@ -1101,17 +1101,17 @@ Value Eval::evaluate(const Position& pos) {
11011101
Color stm = pos.side_to_move();
11021102
Value optimism = pos.this_thread()->optimism[stm];
11031103
Value psq = (stm == WHITE ? 1 : -1) * eg_value(pos.psq_score());
1104-
int complexity = abs(nnue - psq) / 256;
1104+
int complexity = 35 * abs(nnue - psq) / 256;
11051105

1106-
optimism *= (1 + complexity);
1106+
optimism = optimism * (44 + complexity) / 32;
11071107
v = (nnue + optimism) * scale / 1024 - optimism;
11081108

11091109
if (pos.is_chess960())
11101110
v += fix_FRC(pos);
11111111
}
11121112

11131113
// Damp down the evaluation linearly when shuffling
1114-
v = v * (207 - pos.rule50_count()) / 207;
1114+
v = v * (208 - pos.rule50_count()) / 208;
11151115

11161116
// Guarantee evaluation does not hit the tablebase range
11171117
v = std::clamp(v, VALUE_TB_LOSS_IN_MAX_PLY + 1, VALUE_TB_WIN_IN_MAX_PLY - 1);

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)