[Decision] AGENTS.md's comment rule vs preserved verbatim maintainer rulings that contain a model identifier — carve out quotations (A), treat them as violations (B), or leave it undecided (C) #18092

Filed by the skills seat (session session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8) as a decision card out of #18060 / PR #18087 (the Served-tier: reconciliation): triage (5656662371) and the dev both surfaced this class and declined to decide it; ⛔ not decided by this seat either. Bare per ruling ③ (no domain:*, no priority:*); the decision-box routing is triage's.

Dedupe keywords: model identifier, AGENTS.md comment rule, 原话照抄不译, verbatim ruling, seat post, Served-tier.

维护者速读

AGENTS.md 规定「模型标识符不落评论、正文、changeset、文档、代码注释」。但座位贴按制度把你的裁决原话照抄不译,而有的裁决原文本身带着模型型号(例如「你可以直接派 fable 复核」这类原话)——席位转抄时就把型号带进了评论。这类「保存你原话时带进来的型号」和「席位自己写进记录的型号」,规则没有区分。#18060 已把席位自己写的那一类去掉(PR #18087)。剩下这一类要你定:A. 在 AGENTS.md 加一句豁免「逐字保存的维护者原话」(推荐);B. 一律算违规,意味着改写你的原话(分诊已判「比问题本身更糟」);C. 不写,各席位每次自行判断。选 A/B/C?

os-decision-facets

• ① 项目长远合理性:A 缩小规则的模糊面而不增契约(一句豁免,闭合到「逐字引用」一类);B 扩大执行面到需要改写既有原话;C 让特例留在各席位判断里增生。
• ② 实际业务拉动:今天撞上的是每个转抄裁决的座位贴([PM seat] triage (objectstack-wide) — 🟢 os-sam · session_011cAqavo4CEiAUtn6KPQYzq 就座 2026-09-16T09:54Z(维护者召唤)· harness CURRENT 588475c · 前任 R+243→R+246 STALE 收班已留简报 · 本班自 R+247 起 · ⚠️ 欠账:未定级 finding os 40/ui 39 · ① os 33/ui 51 · ④ ui 34 · 决策箱 2(#18364 荐 C 等一个字母)· #18172 仍是唯一 p1 未派 #6015、[PM seat] domain:skills — 🟢 os-elon-musk · R2 seated 09:5xZ on a fresh checkout (harness CURRENT) · 留守 session_01Bz6hxDBqK62NP2W1LATvnt: wave-4 (#18369 · #18382 · #18383) + PR #18405 landing · first: #18394 (D) · queue 8 · decision box 0 #7623、[PM seat] domain:services — 🔴 vacant · 收班 2026-09-16T07:34Z(实证 STALE)· last holder session_01LmoCFLwGkcAGefVf7jryEV · ✅ #18336 已裁 B(留 17.x,范围收窄为 walled-only)→ pm:blocked on #18413 · 决策箱 0 · 新立 #18411 #18412 #18413 · 接手先跑自己的门禁(UNDECIDED≠STALE) #6021 皆有带型号的原话),以及 H64 与型号探针类审计会把它们计成违规;零拉动不成立。
• ③ 防 AI 犯错:A 是闭合枚举(只豁免逐字引用块),响亮;C 是静默容忍;B 会让席位为合规去改写维护者原话——最坏的错误方向。
• ④ 创业阶段不扩散:A 一句话、永久义务最小;B 引入一次性迁移与持续改写义务;C 无义务但无边界。
  Prior rulings read: model identifier 原话照抄不译 AGENTS.md comment rule → unresolved (issue search is not reachable through this session's proxy; the AGENTS.md rule text and triage 5656662371 are the two sources read).
  推荐 A。只看①选 A;②③④ 是否翻转:②不翻(A 直接消除今日撞点),③不翻(A 最闭合),④不翻(A 义务最小)。
  置信缺口:AGENTS.md 是维护者面,豁免句的措辞与位置由维护者定;本席未测逐字引用块之外的存量(dev 读数:board 归档里常量字面值 238 处,其窗口早于本规则,不能读作合规或违规)。

Evidence

• AGENTS.md :442 (verbatim): 「no model identifier lands in a PR title or body, a comment, a changeset, a doc or a code comment.」 The one exemption written there is the harness Co-Authored-By trailer.
• Triage on [finding] The mandated Served-tier: top line puts a model identifier in a GitHub comment, which AGENTS.md:442 forbids in terms — and a p1 guard change would cement it into a gate #18060 (5656662371): 「⛔ a blanket cleanup that rewrites preserved maintainer quotes would be worse than the problem」.
• PR fix(pm): the Served-tier line names the tier constant, never a model identifier — AGENTS.md's comment rule (#18060) #18087 removes the seat-emitted class only and rewrites no quotation; the domain:services seat's Routine prompt carries the same class (a preserved ruling naming a model).

Generated by Claude Code