-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
feat!: simplify useAsyncData() handler signature
#33629
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
|
WalkthroughThe PR changes the Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (2)**/*.{ts,tsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Files:
**/*.{test,spec}.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Files:
🧠 Learnings (1)📚 Learning: 2025-09-10T14:42:56.647ZApplied to files:
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)packages/nuxt/src/app/composables/asyncData.ts (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
@nuxt/kit
nuxt
@nuxt/rspack-builder
@nuxt/schema
@nuxt/vite-builder
@nuxt/webpack-builder
commit: |
911b3cf to
2e570fc
Compare
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #33629 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's use a future flag to make the breaking change for v5
Caution
Breaking change
🔗 Linked issue
fixes #33623
📚 Description
This simplifies the usage for
useAsyncDatahandlers.