build: turn on thin static archives#7957
Merged
bnoordhuis merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom Aug 9, 2016
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Looks like the SmartOS machines still have issues with the thin archives? |
Member
Author
|
You have got to be kidding me... I bet everyone at Joyent still has a mullet too. Workaround added for crummy old smartos. New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/3516/ |
Contributor
|
I wonder if this will help the arm builds finish faster....that would be nice :] @bnoordhuis are there any downsides to this change? |
Member
Author
|
You can't just copy the .a files around anymore and expect it to work, you need the .o files too now. |
Member
|
i'm +1 on this but the smartos bit is a concern. Can we reasonably do this on all other platforms and make that one an exception? (the Joyent comment is a bit inappropriate fwiw) |
Member
Author
I did that six hours ago in the fix-up commit... did you look at the diff? |
Member
|
Missed the additional commit! |
Member
Author
|
CI is green. Can I get a LGTM or two? |
Member
|
Awesome! I completely forgot about this. LGTM. |
Member
|
LGTM |
Thin archives were disabled in 2012 as a workaround (IIRC) for obsolete tooling on one of Joyent's platforms. The last binutils versions that didn't support them was released in 2007 so I think it's safe to assume we can drop support for that now - except on SmartOS, where the tooling still has a distinctive vintage feel to it. Thin archives save space - it shrinks the size of PRODUCT_DIR by 30% - and speed up the final linking step because it doesn't have to assemble 50 MB of static archives (twice! - first to create the archive, then to copy it to PRODUCT_DIR). The archives are just 3.5 MB now and no longer copied around. PR-URL: nodejs#7957 Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
bnoordhuis
force-pushed
the
enable-thin-archives
branch
from
f1a45f2 to
e03a7b2
Compare
cjihrig
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2016
Thin archives were disabled in 2012 as a workaround (IIRC) for obsolete tooling on one of Joyent's platforms. The last binutils versions that didn't support them was released in 2007 so I think it's safe to assume we can drop support for that now - except on SmartOS, where the tooling still has a distinctive vintage feel to it. Thin archives save space - it shrinks the size of PRODUCT_DIR by 30% - and speed up the final linking step because it doesn't have to assemble 50 MB of static archives (twice! - first to create the archive, then to copy it to PRODUCT_DIR). The archives are just 3.5 MB now and no longer copied around. PR-URL: #7957 Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
Contributor
|
@bnoordhuis I've backported this to v4.x please let me know if it shouldn't land |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2016
Thin archives were disabled in 2012 as a workaround (IIRC) for obsolete tooling on one of Joyent's platforms. The last binutils versions that didn't support them was released in 2007 so I think it's safe to assume we can drop support for that now - except on SmartOS, where the tooling still has a distinctive vintage feel to it. Thin archives save space - it shrinks the size of PRODUCT_DIR by 30% - and speed up the final linking step because it doesn't have to assemble 50 MB of static archives (twice! - first to create the archive, then to copy it to PRODUCT_DIR). The archives are just 3.5 MB now and no longer copied around. PR-URL: #7957 Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2016
Thin archives were disabled in 2012 as a workaround (IIRC) for obsolete tooling on one of Joyent's platforms. The last binutils versions that didn't support them was released in 2007 so I think it's safe to assume we can drop support for that now - except on SmartOS, where the tooling still has a distinctive vintage feel to it. Thin archives save space - it shrinks the size of PRODUCT_DIR by 30% - and speed up the final linking step because it doesn't have to assemble 50 MB of static archives (twice! - first to create the archive, then to copy it to PRODUCT_DIR). The archives are just 3.5 MB now and no longer copied around. PR-URL: #7957 Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2016
Thin archives were disabled in 2012 as a workaround (IIRC) for obsolete tooling on one of Joyent's platforms. The last binutils versions that didn't support them was released in 2007 so I think it's safe to assume we can drop support for that now - except on SmartOS, where the tooling still has a distinctive vintage feel to it. Thin archives save space - it shrinks the size of PRODUCT_DIR by 30% - and speed up the final linking step because it doesn't have to assemble 50 MB of static archives (twice! - first to create the archive, then to copy it to PRODUCT_DIR). The archives are just 3.5 MB now and no longer copied around. PR-URL: #7957 Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thin archives were disabled in 2012 as a workaround (IIRC) for obsolete
tooling on one of Joyent's platforms. The last binutils versions that
didn't support them was released in 2007 so I think it's safe to assume
we can drop support for that now.
Thin archives save space - it shrinks the size of PRODUCT_DIR by 30% -
and speed up the final linking step because it doesn't have to assemble
50 MB of static archives (twice! - first to create the archive, then to
copy it to PRODUCT_DIR). The archives are just 3.5 MB now and no longer
copied around.
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/3515/