Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not safer than the original, see #52494 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lpinca is correct. Relying on user headers for any part of the url parsing can lead to the malicious injection of a URL.
I believe the smartest idea would be to just include a note in the documentation that this setup is only an example and shouldn't be used in production for security reasons
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I reviewed without thoroughly analysis. I second @redyetidev idea.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice to see a PR improving the docs. Maybe the best idea to fix the problem with the
Hostheader is simply not to use it? Maybe something like this is better?I actually read the nodeJS docs as a best practice 🙈 If it is not documented here who should come up with the best possible approach?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we were to go with your approach, we wouldn't need a note because it wouldn't present a security issue anymore :-).
If the team agrees with your suggestion, you should open a PR for it. With all the work you put into finding and fixing this issue, you should be the one to request it!
WDYT @lpinca and @ShogunPanda?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure can do. Waiting for an agree- or disagreement 🙈
Team afford. Kudos to @astlouisf and @samhh
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@redyetidev I agree, I can close this one and @mlegenhausen can open a seperate PR to fix this issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done #52555