unused-but-set-variable introduced in b53010b#diff-86a9160147028a03800f8ba4fa555285R1502-R1525 -- not sure how should be handled.

That looks wrong... I'm pretty sure I stumbled on this piece of code a few times and didn't change for a reason. I'll open an issue to investigate it further.

Originally posted by @mmarchini in #297 (comment)