Repository navigation
Conversation
MikeMcC399
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should also try to get the PR title aligned with the content when there are sequential changes to the PR content. That would be a different scope to this PR though, and more complex to achieve.
|
Typically commit messages use so that would be That would only be an issue if it were being parsed to add to a change log, which doesn't apply in this case. Was there some reason you chose the square brackets? |
SimenB
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
makes sense 👍
maybe a label as well?
|
I was just looking at the commits/PRs in the official images, but I guess that form is their recommendation https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/README.md#security-releases. |
In that case I would drop the "feat" and just have "[security]", so perhaps for example:
|
Description
Will optionally make the PR title
feat[security]: Node.js ...instead of the currentfeat: Node.js ...when the changing release lines are marked as security releases.Motivation and Context
Makes it more visible for this repo, but also for the downstream Official Image PRs when we're sending over a security release.
I didn't find a particular conventional commit format for these commit messages.
Testing Details
Example Output(if appropriate)
Changin the v26 version number, which currently was a security release
Changing v27, which isn't a security release
Types of changes
Checklist