-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 698
[WIP] Attempt at fixing appveyor #352
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
135f430 to
e57035a
Compare
b7285a2 to
9320789
Compare
9320789 to
284f93e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fix is probably not the right word here 😜
|
So something is legit killing the the build for node v0.11.14 on windows. Which is awesome since it was working fine yesterday. I've started to narrow it down. The build is fine in v0.11.13 but will break in v0.11.14 on windows only. I don't know if a dev dependency got updated (or needs to be updated) for this to work in v0.11.14 but I'm still looking into it. |
|
It seems like a bug in node-gyp when running I get this output from the console Don't really know why it's doing this. When running this in v0.11.13 I get the following output: Which is what I was expecting. Similar results also on node v0.10.*. |
|
Node 0.12 is vaporware at this point should we just ignore it?
|
|
yeah, we can ignore node 0.12 |
|
Well, are we dropping support for node 0.11? I mean it's meant to be unstable but that seems like a big change. |
|
If we support io.js then ok for not supporting 0.11.x. There should be at some point a 0.11.15 for general review which will be 0.12 (kind of). But at this point is all nonsense. |
|
I agree. 0.12 is pretty much vaporware. IOjs dev sort of jumpstarted it back up a bit, but not really. Still missing deadlines by weeks/months now. if we can get it running consistantly with IO then i'm fine ditching 11, since IO is the new unstable, essentially. |
|
Alright, I'm going to fix this guy up then and merge it in. |
|
I'll also keep an eye on it and try to figure out the underlying issue on whatever spare time I have (lolololol). If I can figure out wtf is happening and why it's dying then I'll put it back in. I wouldn't hold my breath on that though. |
The clone tests are breaking appveyor and this PR is my attempt to figure out why since I can't consistently repo the test fails locally.