Skip to content

feat: export isReady and readyError getter#6

Merged
fengmk2 merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
export-isReady-and-readyError
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

feat: export isReady and readyError getter#6
fengmk2 merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
export-isReady-and-readyError

Conversation

@fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Dec 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new development dependency for improved tooling.
    • Introduced new getter methods for better access to readiness state and errors.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling and clarity in the Ready class functionality.
    • Updated tests to ensure correct behavior of the ready method under various conditions.
  • Chores

    • Updated .gitignore to exclude package-lock.json from version control.
    • Modified CI script for packaging during continuous integration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@fengmk2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 564ab9f and 42d1c39.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/nodejs.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pkg.pr.new.yml (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces enhancements to the readiness and error handling mechanism in a TypeScript project. The changes focus on improving type definitions, error management, and test coverage for the Ready and ReadyEventEmitter classes. Key modifications include updating type signatures, adding new getter methods for readiness state and errors, and refining the test suite to ensure robust error handling and asynchronous behavior.

Changes

File Change Summary
.gitignore Added package-lock.json to ignored files
package.json - Added dev dependency @arethetypeswrong/cli@^0.17.1
- Updated ci script to use attw --pack
src/index.ts - Updated CallbackFunction type signature
- Renamed #readyArg to #readyError
- Added isReady and readyError getters
- Modified error handling logic
test/index.test.ts - Added async to test block
- Updated method signatures for ready()
- Added assertions for isReady and readyError
- Enhanced error handling tests

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant ReadyClass
    participant Callback

    Client->>ReadyClass: ready(arg)
    alt No Error
        ReadyClass->>ReadyClass: Set isReady = true
        ReadyClass->>Callback: Invoke callback(undefined)
    else With Error
        ReadyClass->>ReadyClass: Set isReady = false
        ReadyClass->>ReadyClass: Set readyError
        ReadyClass->>Callback: Invoke callback(error)
    end
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Readiness 🚀

In TypeScript's realm, where errors dance,
Our Ready class takes a careful stance
Getters shine bright, errors now clear
Async magic brings the code so near
Hop along, code, with grace and might! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@socket-security
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Dec 18, 2024

New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@arethetypeswrong/cli@0.17.1 Transitive: environment, filesystem, network, shell, unsafe +48 31.3 MB andrewbranch

View full report↗︎

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/index.ts (1)

74-75: Consider adding type assertion for flag parameter

The flag parameter's type could be narrowed for better type safety.

-    this.#isReady = flag !== false;
-    this.#readyError = flag instanceof Error ? flag : undefined;
+    this.#isReady = flag !== false;
+    this.#readyError = (flag instanceof Error) ? flag : undefined;
test/index.test.ts (1)

252-260: Consider adding timeout assertion

The async test could benefit from an explicit timeout assertion to ensure timely completion.

   it('should await ready error', async () => {
     const someClass = new SomeClass();
+    const start = Date.now();
     setTimeout(() => {
       someClass.ready(new Error('mock async after error'));
     }, 10);
     await assert.rejects(async () => {
       await someClass.ready();
     }, /mock async after error/);
+    assert(Date.now() - start < 100, 'Test took too long');
   });
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e771131 and 564ab9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • src/index.ts (6 hunks)
  • test/index.test.ts (5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (6)
package.json (1)

11-11: LGTM: Enhanced type checking in CI pipeline

The addition of @arethetypeswrong/cli and updated CI script improves type safety verification during continuous integration.

Also applies to: 28-28

src/index.ts (3)

3-3: LGTM: Improved type safety for callback function

The explicit Error | undefined type improves type safety by removing ambiguity in the callback signature.


27-33: LGTM: Well-designed getter methods

The new getter methods provide proper encapsulation for accessing readiness state and errors, following good OOP principles.


111-117: LGTM: Consistent getter implementation in ReadyEventEmitter

The ReadyEventEmitter properly delegates to the Ready instance, maintaining encapsulation.

test/index.test.ts (2)

152-162: LGTM: Comprehensive testing of new getter methods

Good test coverage for the new isReady and readyError getters, including error scenarios and state transitions.


225-250: LGTM: Thorough async error handling tests

Excellent test coverage for async error scenarios, including state transitions and error recovery.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (405d3c0) to head (42d1c39).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master        #6   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           83       118   +35     
  Branches        23        33   +10     
=========================================
+ Hits            83       118   +35     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/get-ready@6

commit: 42d1c39

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit cce2f08 into master Dec 18, 2024
26 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the export-isReady-and-readyError branch December 18, 2024 02:11
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
[skip ci]

## [3.3.0](v3.2.0...v3.3.0) (2024-12-18)

### Features

* export isReady and readyError getter ([#6](#6)) ([cce2f08](cce2f08))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant