forked from arunmecheri/java-sec-code
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
AutoFix PR #28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
nishfath
wants to merge
3
commits into
nishfath-patch-12
Choose a base branch
from
qwietai/autofix/fix0009
base: nishfath-patch-12
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
AutoFix PR #28
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Checking analysis of application
|
| ID | CVSS | Rating | CVE | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 255 | 10.0 | critical | CVE-2018-14721 | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks by leveraging failure to b… |
| 547 | 10.0 | critical | CVE-2021-44228 | Log4j versions prior to 2.16.0 are subject to a remote code execution vulnerability via the ldap JNDI parser. |
| 554 | 10.0 | critical | CVE-2021-44228 | Log4j versions prior to 2.16.0 are subject to a remote code execution vulnerability via the ldap JNDI parser. |
| 245 | 9.8 | critical | CVE-2017-5929 | QOS.ch Logback before 1.2.0 has a serialization vulnerability affecting the SocketServer and ServerSocketReceiver components. The RemoteStreamAppenderCli… |
| 247 | 9.8 | critical | CVE-2017-5929 | QOS.ch Logback before 1.2.0 has a serialization vulnerability affecting the SocketServer and ServerSocketReceiver components. The RemoteStreamAppenderCli… |
| Severity rating | Count |
|---|---|
| Critical | 95 |
| High | 242 |
| Medium | 165 |
| Low | 115 |
| Finding Type | Count |
|---|---|
| Oss_vuln | 370 |
| Vuln | 217 |
| Security_issue | 30 |
| Secret | 2 |
| OWASP 2021 Category | Count |
|---|---|
| A03-Injection | 66 |
| A09-Security-Logging-And-Monitoring-Failures | 53 |
| A01-Broken-Access-Control | 50 |
| A05-Security-Misconfiguration | 46 |
| A10-Server-Side-Request-Forgery-(Ssrf) | 25 |
| A08-Software-And-Data-Integrity-Failures | 5 |
| A07-Identification-And-Authentication-Failures | 1 |
| A02-Cryptographic-Failures | 1 |
1 rule failed.
1 similar comment
Checking analysis of application
|
| ID | CVSS | Rating | CVE | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 255 | 10.0 | critical | CVE-2018-14721 | FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.7 might allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks by leveraging failure to b… |
| 547 | 10.0 | critical | CVE-2021-44228 | Log4j versions prior to 2.16.0 are subject to a remote code execution vulnerability via the ldap JNDI parser. |
| 554 | 10.0 | critical | CVE-2021-44228 | Log4j versions prior to 2.16.0 are subject to a remote code execution vulnerability via the ldap JNDI parser. |
| 245 | 9.8 | critical | CVE-2017-5929 | QOS.ch Logback before 1.2.0 has a serialization vulnerability affecting the SocketServer and ServerSocketReceiver components. The RemoteStreamAppenderCli… |
| 247 | 9.8 | critical | CVE-2017-5929 | QOS.ch Logback before 1.2.0 has a serialization vulnerability affecting the SocketServer and ServerSocketReceiver components. The RemoteStreamAppenderCli… |
| Severity rating | Count |
|---|---|
| Critical | 95 |
| High | 242 |
| Medium | 165 |
| Low | 115 |
| Finding Type | Count |
|---|---|
| Oss_vuln | 370 |
| Vuln | 217 |
| Security_issue | 30 |
| Secret | 2 |
| OWASP 2021 Category | Count |
|---|---|
| A03-Injection | 66 |
| A09-Security-Logging-And-Monitoring-Failures | 53 |
| A01-Broken-Access-Control | 50 |
| A05-Security-Misconfiguration | 46 |
| A10-Server-Side-Request-Forgery-(Ssrf) | 25 |
| A08-Software-And-Data-Integrity-Failures | 5 |
| A07-Identification-And-Authentication-Failures | 1 |
| A02-Cryptographic-Failures | 1 |
1 rule failed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.


Qwiet AI AutoFix
This PR was created automatically by the Qwiet AI AutoFix tool.
As long as it is open, subsequent scans and generated fixes to this same branch will be added to it as new commits.
Each commit fixes one vulnerability.
Some manual intervention might be required before merging this PR.
Project Information
Findings/Vulnerabilities Fixed
Finding 223: Security Best Practices: Cookie Sent Without Secure Attribute in
XSS.storeVulnerability Description
Cookies are used without the Secure attribute set to
true. By intercepting dataCommits/Files Changed
Finding 65: Directory Traversal: Attacker-controlled Data Used in File Path via
filepathinPathTraversal.getImageSecVulnerability Description
Attacker-Controlled input data is used as part of a file path to write a file without escaping or validation. This indicates a directory traversal vulnerability.
Commits/Files Changed
Finding 224: Security Best Practices: Ineffective Spring Application Firewall in
DisableSpringSecurityFirewall.getFirewalledResponseVulnerability Description
The application installs a custom spring application firewall that does nothing.
Commits/Files Changed